Air-passive sampling – recalculation

Unification of active and passive air sampling results

The GENASIS model for recalculation recalculates the passive sampling results using an exponential regression:

where the constants kt, kw and k0 were estimated by using 8-year long time series of passive and active POPs monitoring at the Kosetice observatory.

There are two generic methods of POPs sampling in ambient air. The classical approach is using an active air sampler – a specialized device with air pump, set of filters and eventually further parts as impactors, heating and controllers. Active samplers provide precise results, which may be only slightly affected by external circumstances of the measurement (such as weather). Nevertheless, active air samplers require electricity, regular maintenance and their purchase price is not low; therefore their extensive use is limited.

On the other hand, passive samplers are of a very simple design, consisting of adsorbent and its cover only. They contain no mechanical parts, do not require power, and are relatively small and quite cheap. That is why they can be used in practically unrestricted amount. Their biggest disadvantage is, however, high uncertainity of the results (in ng/filter), given by high dependence of the adsorption and the total air mass went through the sampler on external conditions such as temperature, wind speed and direction, sunrise and others. That is why results from the passive samplers, given in units mass/filter, are incompatible with standard concentration units mass/air volume.

Several models of measurements recalculation were developed over time taking into account temperature, wind speed and other factors. Two most often used approaches and their variants are available inside the genpastoact function of the genasis R package, which is included in our example – the Global Atmospheric Passive Sampling (GAPS) model, strictly following the physical nature of sampling processes and rather empirical GENASIS model based on comparison of long time seies. Both different approaches can be compared in our example.

Recalculation models

There are two completely different metodologies how to compute real concentration from the passive sampler data. The Genasis model is based on 8-year simultaneous measurements with active and passive samplers in Kosetice. In addition to the measurement itself, temperature and wind speed were recorded and consequently a linear model was created, putting all these quantities into context:

where cpassive denotes the result of passive sampling in mass/filter/day units and k0, kt and kw denote the constants to be estimated by the model. Once the (compound-specific) constants were estimated, they were used in the same manner to determine the concentration. Similar constants were also computed for temperature dependent model and also for model which is independent on the external conditions (the less precise one).

Entirly different methodology is used inside the GAPS model, described in detail in the article by Harner et al. "Calibration and application of PUF disk passive air samplers for tracking polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs)" (see reference below).

Previous step.

References

Harner, T.; Su, K.; Genualdi, S.; Karpowicz, J.; Ahrens, L.; Mihele, C.; Schuster, J.; Charland, J.; Narayan, J., Calibration and application of PUF disk passive air samplers for tracking polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs). Atmospheric Environment 2013, 75, 123-128.

 

Harner, T., Borůvková, J., Personal communication. 2014.

Next step
4: Passives recalculation
4: Passives recalculation